Banks dives deep into how we can improve CS Majors, making them more impactful and prestigious. One of his main points is the need to remove the BO1 format, which has become even more unpredictable with the MR12 system. He presents strong arguments and examples to show why BO3 matches ensure higher-quality Counter-Strike, reducing randomness and making results more meaningful.
Another key topic he discusses is the idea of fourth-place deciders, which could work well, helping to determine rankings more fairly. Banks also believes that players should receive medals for their achievements, allowing them to take home a symbol of their success—especially since the Major trophy remains with the tournament organizers.
He then touches on the format of the Grand Final, questioning whether the BO5 structure, which is used in many tournaments, truly makes Majors feel special. According to Banks, Majors should stand out as elite, once-in-a-lifetime events, and making the final more unique could add to their prestige. His insights highlight the need for meaningful changes to ensure that CS Majors continue to be the pinnacle of competitive Counter-Strike.
